Do you think it is better for students to your workplace before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, much easier to write, easier to read.

Practical experience, contacts, at work skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as prone to find employment…. essay writer 247 com.

Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students will change their higher education course while at uni….

Many individuals think that it’s simpler to learn something in a group instead of individually. Would you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has several advantages
Elements of teamwork can be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Some individuals genuinely believe that children have to do organised activities in their free time while some think that children must be absolve to do what they need to do in their free time. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 favour that is-In of them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it will be unfair for this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to get
-furthermore research has revealed that the mind operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Many people say that globalisation and also the growing wide range of multinational companies have a effect that is negative environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your answer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your role.

-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop of the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…

Scientists think that so that you can protect environmental surroundings, people must use less energy within their daily lives. However, a lot of people have never changed the real way they live. Why do you think many individuals have not taken individual action? What could be done to encourage them to do something?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy associated with the commons
– Collective problem – simpler to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What might be done to cause them to become take action?
– Media campaigns by the government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……

Some think that may be the responsibility of individuals to deal with the surroundings. Others say it’s the government that should take care of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should look after the environmental surroundings because:
Our company is the consumers, we vote with this wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should care for the environment because:
They have the charged power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
allowed to be guardians of the country, this means collectively they’ve been guardians for the earth… although not true the truth is

Both should always be doing more!

In lots of countries small shops and town centers are getting out of business, because people have a tendency to drive towards the large stores that are out-of-town. This results in a rise in car use, and in addition it ensures that people without cars don’t have a lot of access to out-of-town stores. Do you think benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?